Shadow Joe V. Legalized Murder.(Of the innocent or otherwise undeserving.)

Stand your ground, Castle Doctrine... no matter what label you give it, the definition is always the same: License to Kill. More specifically, the license to kill whether it's necessary or not.

These cases here reveal everything that's wrong with this idealogy.
Unarmed men, all of them, one a teenager who wasn't even acting remotely violent.
The other who was drunk and confused and quite clearly had no idea what was going on.
The last one, while clearly no saint certainly didn't deserve to be shot dead like that.
All these cases have another thing in common:
The deaths were not necessary.

Not one of these homeowners had reason to fear their lives were in danger, and still chose to kill people who had done nothing to deserve their fates.
There is no realm of reality where that is right.

Don't get me wrong like the rabid rednecks I've sparred with in the past. I am by no means a soft-hearted liberal, not by a long shot.
If it were up to me, every single monster on this earth who killed an innocent, or tortured an animal, or molested or raped would be rounded up on some man-made island and napalmed straight to hell.
The problem is, those of you who support laws like these are the ones killing innocents.
Well, "people who don't deserve to die", but close enough.

See, I have a very simple stance on the matter:
If you don't fear for your life, or the life of another and you don't know what kind of person you might be killing, don't kill 'em.
Simple as that.